STATEMENT OF CASES
CASES BROUGHT TO PROVIDE CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE OF CORRUPTNESS IN OUR LEGAL AND JUDICIAL SYSTEM IN AMERICA!!!
Allran et. al. vs. the New York Federal Reserve Bank et. al.
On April 28, 2010, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint containing Five separate Causes of Actions against the Defendants. Over a year was spent gathering the facts, researching the law and editing drafts to concisely and accurately prove how the national debt was illegal by violating the Constitution.
Government activities such as the Free Press and State Governments
In paragraph nine the Attorney Generals and Governors were sent copies of the Complaint and asked to join in the Action within six months. If they failed to do so, a motion would be filed making them Defendants in the case. The unlawful dismissal of the case by the Judge prevented this.
This case was very revealing about how our corrupt Federal Government and the owners of Wall Street and International Banks had stolen much of the wealth of America. We anticipated the defendants would file a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b) (6). It was shocking when Wells Fargo was the first Defendant to file a motion for an extension of time. The very next day, the Judge under his own motion and under the same rule, dismissed the case sua sponte with prejudice
The Judge had taken three separate Oaths to support and defend the Constitutions of the United States and North Carolina and to do equal justice to the rich and poor. He chose to violate all three. His order protected government and banking officials who had violated their Oaths and failed to perform their duties. He allowed the Federal Reserve officials and Wall Street Banks to continue robbing the people using the Ponzi scheme of using worthless paper they created for pennies while charging the American people over 6 trillion dollars in interest for their government to borrow it. His ruling favored the rich and penalized the poor.
To dismiss this case, even under the illegal method used, the Judge would have to admit the facts stated in the Complaint were true. Read the Complaint and you will see there are enough facts stated to put many people, including the Judge, in jail for willfully violating their Oath and not performing their duty. Under his Oaths, the Judge violated his Oaths by dismissing the case with prejudiced without any notice to the Plaintiffs whatsoever. He should have notified them and given them time to correct any fault he found with the papers filed.
On this website, you will see cases filed against the government seeking relief from wrongful acts are being dismissed with prejudice by Federal District Judges.
Allran et. al. vs. Wells Fargo and Robinson, Bradshaw & Hinson, (RB&H)
This case was based on Wells Fargo violating the Plaintiffs’ Constitutional rights to a jury trial by hiring RB&H who supported the action of the Court in dismissing the case under Rule of Procedure 12(b)(6). RB&H filed two Briefs in the Fourth Circuit Court. They violated their Oath to support the Constitution of NC and the Rules of Professional Conduct as set out in the Complaint.
Allran et. al. vs. Mullen
This action was against the Chief Judge of the Federal Court in Charlotte who violated three of the Oaths required to be a Federal Judge. In an Action, seeking to limit the government to the power granted to it in the Constitution of the United States, Judge Mullen, as soon as the first of some twenty defendants became subject to the jurisdiction of the court, own his own motion, with no notice to the plaintiffs, dismissed the Action with prejudice. There cannot be a more serious crime by a Federal official than violating their Oath to support and defend the Constitution. The Courts’ purpose is to enforce the Constitution, not violate it.
Action was filed against Graham Mullen individually as a citizen of NC violating an Oath required to become an attorney by citizens of NC. No Federal Law or parties from other states were involved. Under the Constitution of the United States, no jurisdiction was granted whatsoever in cases between citizens of the same state involving only state law under Article III, Sec 2 of the US Constitution.
We filed the Action separate from the one against RB&H because we knew Congress had enacted an illegal law giving the US Attorney authority to remove cases against Federal employees immediately to Federal Courts with no notice to anyone. As usual, the US Attorney violated his Oath to support and defend the Constitution and had the case removed to a Federal Court.
The US Attorney further violated his Oath in moving for a Declaratory Judgment under the Rules of Procedure, which the court allowed with no right to be heard extended to the Plaintiffs. In allowing the Motion to Dismiss because, “Judges have immunity from actions taken as a part of their duties”. This invalid law was created by the Courts to protect them from being caught. The Complaint was based on the fact that the Judge had committed perjury in violating his Oath to maintain, support and defend the Constitution of NC that unequivocally gives the right in civil cases to trial by a jury. NO LAW CAN PROTECT ANY AMERICAN FOR VIOLATING OATHS AND DUTIES REQUIRED BY THE CONSTITUTION.
IN RE: THE APPLICATION TO THE NC GENERAL ASSEMBLY TO OBEY THEIR OATHS AND PERFORM THEIR DUTIES FILED ON JUNE 17, 2011 AND SUPPORTE3D BY OVER 5OO PEOPLE.
In spite the letters that have been sent to each member of the General Assembly, its’ leaders and their attorneys, no communication has been received by the applicant’s attorney. Efforts to have it placed on the calendars of the Assembly have been ignored except a message from the clerk of the House of Representatives that legislation would have to be introduced to be considered.
Read the entire Application and you will see how our government no longer represents the people, but represents special interest.
Who else, other than special interest and our government, would want to make our Constitutions the Supreme Law of the land UNENFORCEABLE, WHICH WOULD GIVE OUR GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY TO DO ANYTHING IT CHOSE AND SPECIAL INTEREST THE AUTHORITY TO EXPLOIT THE PEOPLE????
The unpublished decision of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals is conclusive proof of corruptness of our Federal Judicial System.
The letter sent to the Deans of all Law Schools in NC and the Chairman of the NC Department of Education informs them of deficiencies in their Curricula due to the influence of the illegal US Department of Education. We suggest you write or Email them requesting them to terminate the influence of the US Department and select their own curricula they deem in the best interest of the people in NC.
Next week, we will send a Report to the people in Durham. Go on our web site to read it. You may be interested in observations about the University James B Duke established for the residents of the area served by Duke Power Company.
CASES BROUGHT TO PROVIDE CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE OF CORRUPTNESS IN OUR LEGAL AND JUDICIAL SYSTEM IN AMERICA!!!
Allran et. al. vs. the New York Federal Reserve Bank et. al.
On April 28, 2010, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint containing Five separate Causes of Actions against the Defendants. Over a year was spent gathering the facts, researching the law and editing drafts to concisely and accurately prove how the national debt was illegal by violating the Constitution.
- The First Cause of Action sought recovery of trillions of dollars paid by the people as interest on an illegal debt. The Constitution unequivocally specifies money as “gold and silver coin”. The Government authorized the privately owned Federal Reserve Banks to write checks, make deposit slips or print worthless paper designated as money and lend it to the government in requested amounts. This is how the illegal loans were created which placed the people in debt. It is the greatest Ponzi scheme ever devised by man.
- The Second Cause of Action presents indisputable evidence that the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and the Coinage Control Act of 1965 violate Article I, Sections 8 and 10 of the Constitution. Laws passed by the government or opinions of the Supreme Court Amending the Constitution are void on their face. The Constitution specifies the two ways the Constitution can be amended.
- The Third Cause of Action seeks recovery by the Shareholders of Washington Mutual, Inc. and Wachovia Bank for damages suffered by the Defendants’ violation of their Constitutional and human rights combined with the unjust enrichment of the same Defendants.
- The Fourth Cause of Action seeks recovery from American International Group, Inc. untold billions of dollars unlawfully made available to them by the Secretary of the Treasury to pay losses to the corporations causing the financial crisis resulting in losses they knew would occur. It was worse than paying a man to burn his own house to collect its value because the loss they sustained was only paper money, stocks or bonds.
- The Fifth Cause of Action detailed how the owners of the corporations owning control of the Federal Reserve Banks used worthless paper as money to buy all the real and personal property they desired while controlling our Federal Government.
Government activities such as the Free Press and State Governments
In paragraph nine the Attorney Generals and Governors were sent copies of the Complaint and asked to join in the Action within six months. If they failed to do so, a motion would be filed making them Defendants in the case. The unlawful dismissal of the case by the Judge prevented this.
This case was very revealing about how our corrupt Federal Government and the owners of Wall Street and International Banks had stolen much of the wealth of America. We anticipated the defendants would file a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b) (6). It was shocking when Wells Fargo was the first Defendant to file a motion for an extension of time. The very next day, the Judge under his own motion and under the same rule, dismissed the case sua sponte with prejudice
The Judge had taken three separate Oaths to support and defend the Constitutions of the United States and North Carolina and to do equal justice to the rich and poor. He chose to violate all three. His order protected government and banking officials who had violated their Oaths and failed to perform their duties. He allowed the Federal Reserve officials and Wall Street Banks to continue robbing the people using the Ponzi scheme of using worthless paper they created for pennies while charging the American people over 6 trillion dollars in interest for their government to borrow it. His ruling favored the rich and penalized the poor.
To dismiss this case, even under the illegal method used, the Judge would have to admit the facts stated in the Complaint were true. Read the Complaint and you will see there are enough facts stated to put many people, including the Judge, in jail for willfully violating their Oath and not performing their duty. Under his Oaths, the Judge violated his Oaths by dismissing the case with prejudiced without any notice to the Plaintiffs whatsoever. He should have notified them and given them time to correct any fault he found with the papers filed.
On this website, you will see cases filed against the government seeking relief from wrongful acts are being dismissed with prejudice by Federal District Judges.
Allran et. al. vs. Wells Fargo and Robinson, Bradshaw & Hinson, (RB&H)
This case was based on Wells Fargo violating the Plaintiffs’ Constitutional rights to a jury trial by hiring RB&H who supported the action of the Court in dismissing the case under Rule of Procedure 12(b)(6). RB&H filed two Briefs in the Fourth Circuit Court. They violated their Oath to support the Constitution of NC and the Rules of Professional Conduct as set out in the Complaint.
Allran et. al. vs. Mullen
This action was against the Chief Judge of the Federal Court in Charlotte who violated three of the Oaths required to be a Federal Judge. In an Action, seeking to limit the government to the power granted to it in the Constitution of the United States, Judge Mullen, as soon as the first of some twenty defendants became subject to the jurisdiction of the court, own his own motion, with no notice to the plaintiffs, dismissed the Action with prejudice. There cannot be a more serious crime by a Federal official than violating their Oath to support and defend the Constitution. The Courts’ purpose is to enforce the Constitution, not violate it.
Action was filed against Graham Mullen individually as a citizen of NC violating an Oath required to become an attorney by citizens of NC. No Federal Law or parties from other states were involved. Under the Constitution of the United States, no jurisdiction was granted whatsoever in cases between citizens of the same state involving only state law under Article III, Sec 2 of the US Constitution.
We filed the Action separate from the one against RB&H because we knew Congress had enacted an illegal law giving the US Attorney authority to remove cases against Federal employees immediately to Federal Courts with no notice to anyone. As usual, the US Attorney violated his Oath to support and defend the Constitution and had the case removed to a Federal Court.
The US Attorney further violated his Oath in moving for a Declaratory Judgment under the Rules of Procedure, which the court allowed with no right to be heard extended to the Plaintiffs. In allowing the Motion to Dismiss because, “Judges have immunity from actions taken as a part of their duties”. This invalid law was created by the Courts to protect them from being caught. The Complaint was based on the fact that the Judge had committed perjury in violating his Oath to maintain, support and defend the Constitution of NC that unequivocally gives the right in civil cases to trial by a jury. NO LAW CAN PROTECT ANY AMERICAN FOR VIOLATING OATHS AND DUTIES REQUIRED BY THE CONSTITUTION.
IN RE: THE APPLICATION TO THE NC GENERAL ASSEMBLY TO OBEY THEIR OATHS AND PERFORM THEIR DUTIES FILED ON JUNE 17, 2011 AND SUPPORTE3D BY OVER 5OO PEOPLE.
In spite the letters that have been sent to each member of the General Assembly, its’ leaders and their attorneys, no communication has been received by the applicant’s attorney. Efforts to have it placed on the calendars of the Assembly have been ignored except a message from the clerk of the House of Representatives that legislation would have to be introduced to be considered.
Read the entire Application and you will see how our government no longer represents the people, but represents special interest.
Who else, other than special interest and our government, would want to make our Constitutions the Supreme Law of the land UNENFORCEABLE, WHICH WOULD GIVE OUR GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY TO DO ANYTHING IT CHOSE AND SPECIAL INTEREST THE AUTHORITY TO EXPLOIT THE PEOPLE????
The unpublished decision of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals is conclusive proof of corruptness of our Federal Judicial System.
The letter sent to the Deans of all Law Schools in NC and the Chairman of the NC Department of Education informs them of deficiencies in their Curricula due to the influence of the illegal US Department of Education. We suggest you write or Email them requesting them to terminate the influence of the US Department and select their own curricula they deem in the best interest of the people in NC.
Next week, we will send a Report to the people in Durham. Go on our web site to read it. You may be interested in observations about the University James B Duke established for the residents of the area served by Duke Power Company.
